This is where we hope to keep you thinking.  The site does not focus on diversionary minutia.  You get enough of that  incessant spin coming from mainstream media.

 

"Sovereignty and the Immorality of Corporations"

[ Part Two ]

"Every business, cause and movement must attend to its growth.
If it is not growing, it is seeing the first signs of death."

by Robertus Frederickus

We know that combinations are not a natural creation but that governments create or give license to them.

Let’s substitute corporations for the word combinations. It becomes quite evident when we realize that God didn’t create corporations. So, corporations must be the creation of governments in the hands of corrupt men. Corruption is not of God!

We talked about the fact that there are only two kinds of law. There is the law of nature and of nature’s God, and the laws of man.

Corporations should not have been able to exist in America. And, in fact, originally, after the Declaration of Independence, when our nation was first founded, they couldn’t exist. But today, corporations are a matter of fact. We have, in America, just about every type of corporation imaginable. Corruption abounds! It thrives. It flourishes! It is prolific!

Let’s continue with the history of corporations in America. How did they start? Where did they come from and what was the rationale behind them?

Ultimately, what did they turn into? These are all good questions and they deserve answers.

I want you to focus on our Constitution. Check Article I, Section 8, Clause 7: "Congress shall have power to establish post offices and post roads."

What in the world could be wrong with this? It sounds rather benign. But here we have a great measure of power to give to anyone, especially when it is centralized at the federal level.

The building of an infrastructure of a nation is a big project, isn’t it? At the time of signing of the Constitution, our country was located primarily along the Eastern Coast. In order to expand, it had to expand westward. There were rivers and the Appalachian Mountains. It was decided very early on CCU Quarterly Insights Volume #1 Issue #111 that the building of roads was extremely important for the good of the nation. There is nothing wrong with this so far. The danger can be found in the fact that the building of these roads was an enormous undertaking and it was argued that these projects were too large for one individual to attempt.

I don’t agree, nor did most of the early sovereign Citizens of America agree. However, Congress deceitfully used the rules of necessity to justify their determination to form corporations, which would combine the efforts and the capital of sovereign Americans for a collective project controlled by industrialists (of their choice) to build the roads.

This is a license to steal! This is a huge a license to steal! Congress urged the Union (each individual State), to begin to charter corporations. This was the advent of "Toll Road10" companies. Further, it is common sense that when a road reached a river there would have to be a bridge. Hence the Charles River Bridge Corporation was one of the first corporations to build a bridge across the Charles River using this ploy to give power to politicians, who were elected and owned by the industrialists, who were owned by the criminal, European, elitist, banking cartel-thugs.

Way back then we already had problems, didn’t we?

The industrialists and their crony friends, the criminal, European, elitist, banking cartel-thugs, became power brokers over what was happening in America. They were very astute. They pointed Senators and House Members to Article 4, Section 3 that essentially says that Congress shall have the power to dispose of public land. This is an enormous power also.

In the early stages of our history we were land-rich but money-poor. We didn’t have much money but we had enormous amounts of land. It was all under the collective control of our central government.

Early on, the industrialists combined forces with the politicians and formed corporations to build roads and bridges. Congress took the position that, since it is the duty of Congress to provide for the Roads, they could appropriate public lands to the corporations to aid in the development of the roads.

This seems logical, doesn’t it? The idea was sold to the American 10 In the case of Butcher’s Union Company versus Crecent City, the clerk read this. ". . . If the government is allowed to place a tax on what is a natural right it can raise that tax to the point where that right has been effectively destroyed. That is tyranny."

Public as something Congress would do for their benefit and for their good. Congress would develop an infrastructure. What could be wrong with that?

The infrastructure included utilities, which were highly regulated. Ostensibly, this was so they could not grow to the point where they would be able to violate the rights of sovereign individuals. This was the standard form of propaganda of that day. This was acceptable to the common folk because they didn’t understand liberalism/socialism/communism.

They really didn’t understand the criminal mindset of the industrialist nor did they have a clue that the money and power behind the politicians in America was none other than the criminal, European, elitist, banking cartel-thugs.

It was discovered that canals were also a means of transportation. Canals between rivers could link territories. More corporations were needed. So, canal corporations were formed. Congress appropriated land for this purpose.

Have you ever heard the saying that "Power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely." I agree with that saying. In the beginning, mankind was corrupted. History proves this. This is the carnal nature of man. Power provides the vehicle for moving man towards corruption. Consequently, when government is given power, what will happen? Won’t it tend to increase the potential for additional corruption? As more corporations were formed, Congress used the power of the Constitution to appropriate public lands to the corporations.

Note that in most cases, the owners of the corporations were not the states or the people but House members, Senators and Governors. They were appropriating for themselves the public lands of this country. Once these types of combinations began to form, the power in the hands of industrialists and their criminal friends grew. They were not equal with the rest of society any longer and they displaced, superseded and supplanted the God-given [unalienable] rights of the people.

This corruption existed at the highest levels of large city governments, county government, of all state governments and the federal government. None of this was good. In fact, it was the antithesis of sovereignty and the individual’s [unalienable] right to life, liberty and ownership of property. CCU Quarterly Insights Volume #1 Issue #112

Then came the invention of the railroad. Can railroads carry the mail? Can they also provide a means of transportation, which could be construed as for the public good? This was a good argument for more concentration of power in the hands of a few people. Who would deny the importance of railroads?

And so there were more corporations. Our Congress literally appropriated to themselves and their cronies tens of millions of acres of land. This was the beginning of a class system in America. The result was a concentration of enormous power and wealth in the hands of a few. Most of these people were the CEOs of the corporations. The rest of our society was made up of the common folk. The common folk were the workers and producers. They were sovereign American Citizens.

When the time came for elections, these powerful elitists who either owned or controlled corporations, had sufficient money to outspend the common folk. It was the elitist power brokers and the CEO’s who provided the money and bought votes for their candidates to be elected.

Corporate leadership and their wealth made all this possible.

You might think of this process in another light. The corporations provided jobs. If an employee did not support their employer, would they keep their job?

What I’m saying is that corporate power developed so quickly and entrenched itself so deeply, that the major theme of all elections was the blackmail.

Have you heard of the "White House Tapes?" As it relates to the tapes, "Who donated large amounts of money for the President’s re-election campaign?" Certainly not the common folk. As in most examples in our history, don’t the common folk believe in the President? Of course! Where does the money come from to convince the common folk to believe the lies? It comes from the leadership of the large corporations who owe their existence to the perverted power of criminal, European, elitist, banking cartelthugs who control government.

Where do the large corporations get their money? The money comes from the common folk who purchase their products and services. Government contracts force the expropriation11 of money from the taxpayers 11

I won’t define expropriation in a traditional sense. For clarity, however, you need to understand the generic definition. "To deprive of possession or proprietary rights." "To take, surrender or transfer ownership from one individual to another." In other words, politicians took land that belonged to the people and gave it to their bosses and their lackeys. (producers).

The CEO’s of the corporations receive favors from their elected and controlled political lackeys. This all happens simultaneously.

This should be sufficient proof that corporations are an anathema, a curse, an abhorrence and an abomination. They destroy [unalienability], individual sovereignty and life, liberty and the right to own property. This should now be self-evident.

So, already in the beginning of our history, we had problems, and didn’t all this culminate in a major war? I’m attempting to place a magnifying glass on these examples.

Since Congress had the power to appropriate public lands, they made sure that those lands went for buying votes in future elections. They made sure that their power was vote effective.

In 1830 there existed a total of 30 miles of railroads.

By 1860, at the beginning of the civil war, we had over 30,000 miles of railroad. This, of course, meant that corporations owned tens of millions of acres.

This exposes that there was wholesale expropriation of the peoples’ lands and liberties. This exploitation only increased and intensified tensions over the years. Note that any time there is an appropriation of land, money or of anything else, there must be at least an equal (and usually more) amount of expropriation12. In other words, to give your friends land, the government first had to take it away from the people.

This is expropriation. To take something/anything, owned privately from a sovereign Citizen to be used and owned by another, in this case the government and its appointees, is expropriation. An appropriation can’t happen unless there is an expropriation first! This should be self-evident!

How many miles of railroads do you think existed below the Mason Dixon line? In 1860, at the beginning of the civil war, there existed less than 8,000 miles of railroad compared to the 30,000 total miles. Would you say the South had a reason to be upset?

Under our Constitution, states were allowed to be admitted to the Union within a certain set of guidelines. Each state had two Senators to create 12 A definitive understanding is: to deprive of possession or proprietary rights; to transfer to one’s own possession; to steal and to kill! CCU Quarterly Insights Volume #1 Issue #113

political parity between the states. Each state had the same degree of power in the Senate. But how many representatives did each state have in the House of Representatives? Didn’t that number depend on the population of the state?

Where was the greatest concentration of people? Wasn’t it in the Northeast?

Therefore political power was directly proportional to population density, wasn’t it? Where was the majority of the population located at the time of the Civil War?

The answer is, "the Northeast." Can you draw some conclusions? The authority of the Constitution was supposed to establish political parity. However, votes in the House of Representatives completely favored the North. This allowed the voting power of the North to use appropriations to steal the wealth of the nation while serving the corporations, with the

creation of ever-larger government. Where did the mass of the wealth and power accumulate? In the

North! Of course the criminal, European, elitist, banking cartel-thugs understood this as they directed these activities. The common folk back then didn’t have a clue how this all worked, and they still don’t!

Under the authority of the Constitution Congress had the awesome power to admit new states to the Union.

Early in American Constitutional history, a battle  began to rage about who was essentially in control.

The Southern states tried to maintain a political parity with the North. They were out-numbered in the House of Representatives. They didn’t have nearly the wealth the North had. Do you think this could lead to problems? Did you ever hear of the Missouri Compromise? It was an act of Congress. It essentially said that any time Congress admits a Northern state into the Union, it must also admit a Southern state. This was ostensibly to maintain political parity.

The Northern states were the industrial states while the Southern states were largely agrarian. Generally, the South depended on manual labor as opposed to more skilled labor in the North. Of course this statement is an over-simplification, but I hope you accept it for what I intend it to be.

The South tried to protect slavery as an institution. The North tended to protect its industrial complex as an institution. No doubt, both were wrong.

For this argument you get some insight into state’s rights issues that, at the time, and ever since, have been an on-going argument in Congress and state legislatures.

Do you think, for a second, that there was any trust and respect between the two regions?

 American politics functioned under the Missouri Compromise for many years until Stephen Douglas, running against Lincoln in 1860, proposed a new bill.

Nebraska was going to become a state. Nebraska, being north of the Mason Dixon Line, was going to enter as a "free" state.

Kansas was also going to become a state. Stephen Douglas introduced a bill that said America would no longer tolerate the Missouri Compromise. It said that we should now follow a new act called the "Kansas/Nebraska Act."

That act would allow any new state entering the Union to enter under its own free choice.

 The act permitted each state to choose whether or not it would be North or South, "free" or "slave."

Can you appreciate the coming battle? And the battle did come. It raged in the state of Kansas first. The Northern industrial states, with all their power and money sent thousands of people into Kansas to register as voters. Again, ostensibly, they wanted to create a "free" state. What they really wanted was more power for the industrialists who were owned and controlled by the powerful, criminal, European elitist banking cartel-thugs.

The Southern states did exactly the same thing except that their numbers weren’t as great. They could not compete with the industrialized North nor did they have the money.

The Civil War began! In fact, the Civil War started in Kansas. There was a full-blown revolution in the state of Kansas. The result of the national elections of 1860 gave America a new President. It was Abraham Lincoln. He was the candidate of what was then called the radical Republicans.

When he was elected, the Southern states had had enough. It was the "last straw." They concluded that parity did not exist and it was not obtainable. They said they were going to secede. And they did!

The Civil War spread. Lincoln was the President. He didn’t have a Congress. The Southern states seceded. There could no longer be a nation according to the Constitution. There wasn’t even a quorum in the Congress. There was no government left. This amounted to a dissolution of the Union.

So, what did the President say? He said, "that under the power of the Presidency, he had a duty to the nation at large." It was to preserve the nation. As President he claimed he could do anything that CCU Quarterly Insights Volume #1 Issue #114 was necessary for the preservation of the nation.

He disregarded the Constitution, the separation of powers, and the Constitutions of the sovereign Republic states. They meant nothing. He said that he had unlimited power because we were at war.

He issued executive orders to call for the state militias to raise armies. He instituted a draft of all the young men. Under the power he created unconstitutionally, he could conscript a young man’s body into his army. If the young man didn’t come forth, he could throw him into jail.

He suspended the writ of Habeas Corpus. This is the power that an excuse can create. In this case the excuse was war.

These powers are enormous, aren’t they? And, by the-way, most of what was done was done ex post facto.

Once war is declared, be assured that any government we have in Washington will declare that there are no limitations on its powers.

Be assured that that government will claim it can do anything that is necessary. Lincoln, did just that. He prosecuted the South and the rest of America suffers to this day including our personal sovereignty.

This is a good example of the central planning powers of government. Once the government declares war, whether it be to combat drugs, alcohol, annexation, protection of a territory etc., it will plan its every action against the people wherever they might reside.

It will claim power to organize and control the nation’s production, agriculture, transportation, education, money supply, communications, arms and troops; in fact everything.

This has been updated as recently as 1978 with the Federal Emergency Management Agency, FEMA. It was established by Executive Order number 12148 and signed into existence by President Jimmy Carter.

It was originally billed as an umbrella organization to administer emergency relief in the event of a national disaster, war or national crisis. It was designed to carry out a series of executive orders if the President declares a national emergency. However, the term "national emergency" was never defined. The definition could be as arbitrary as any tyrant chooses to make it.

Executive Order number 10995 provides for seizure of all communications media of the United States. It provides for seizure of all electrical power, fuel and minerals from both the public and private sectors.

This won’t be administered by your government, but by those who control the "invisible government," the Corporate United States in the hands of the criminal, international (mostly European), elitist, banking cartel-thugs who own the industrial complex as well as the banks. They have all the power and all the money.

Executive Order number 10998 provides for seizure of all food supplies and resources public and private, and all farms and farm equipment.

Executive Order number 10999 provides for the seizure of all transportation including personal cars, trucks, or vehicles of any kind and for total control over all highways, seaports, and waterways.

Executive order 11000 provides for the seizure of all American people or work forces under federal supervision including the splitting up of families if the government deems it necessary.

Executive Order number 11051 gives the office of emergency planning (remember central planning) complete authorization to put the above orders into effect in times of increased international tension or economic or financial crisis. That could be almost anything! It remains undefined!

Are the pieces of the puzzle coming together so you can begin seeing the entire picture?

 Who defines the crisis? It is a fact that any government not totally bound by the Constitution, will have politicians ignoring or perverting it, or people ignoring their responsibility of citizenship and joining forces with the corruptibles. The end result will always be slavery and bondage.

Why would any president in a declared free nation want these types of powers?

Why would any respectable president sign into law these types of power, especially here in America?

What about Jefferson Davis (1808 - 1889)? He was the President of the Southern nation. Did he claim the same powers? Of course he did! The only difference was that he acted on a somewhat smaller scale.

The South had less money and less power.

Both North and South were powerful combines (corporations) leveled against the common folk. Of course, the common folk did not understand what you are being taught. CCU Quarterly Insights Volume #1 Issue #115

Here is a point to examine. Under the Constitution, who had the power and the control over creating money?

If your answer was, the "President," let me ask you this question . . . would our forefathers have been so stupid to place this awesome amount of power into the hands of one person? Of course not! They were so concerned with political abuse of power that they required the separation of powers so no one person or entity could gain control.

If your answer was "Congress," here is another thought. Why would our forefathers provide a combination of men, with that awesome responsibility, knowing that men are corruptible? I don’t think so!

So what does the Constitution say? Article I Section 8 Clause 5 says that Congress shall have the power to coin the money and to regulate its value. What does the word "coin" mean? It means to change the form of a metal.

Look back to my question. Who received the power to create money? It wasn’t given to government! No person in government had that authority. Period.

We the people reserved that power to ourselves.

Remember the 10th amendment? It says, "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people."

In other words, our forefathers said, if in the first NINE Amendments we forgot something, the government couldn’t do that either.

The Constitution does not give the federal government the power to create money! This is a fact! In Article I Section 10, the Constitution prohibits the state governments to create money also.

It says. "No state shall make anything but gold and silver coin the tender in payment of debts." So, who had the power to create the money? That right was reserved to the common folk and not to government. Sovereign American Citizens were the only ones who could go into the countryside to dig the metal. We would then take the metal to the mint. The mint would purify and standardize the metal, stamp it into a coin and give it back to the sovereign Citizen. That is the way it used to be. There was a minimal fee for this transaction.

Now, think about what President Lincoln did after war was declared. He said that we had to have money to prosecute the South. He then claimed the power to create money! It was just like the King of England taking whatever power was needed to accomplish the King’s goals and aspirations.

President Lincoln, presiding over a defunct government, that according to the Constitution, no longer existed, brought a man to his bogus presidency by the name of Salmon Portland Chase who was the former governor of Ohio. Chase introduced a bill before the Northern Congress. Keep in mind that at this time, there really wasn’t a government, if we look at all this Constitutionally. This bill was, of course, supported by the Northern industrialists who each owed their wealth and their power to the corporation given them by criminals in government.

With this support, Congress passed the National Bank Act of 1863. This bogus and fiat act of Congress permitted the Northern states to "create" money in direct blatant contradistinction to the Constitution. Where do you suppose that idea came from? You guessed it, the criminal, international, elitist, banking cartel-thugs.

This was the beginning of something I call "the selective creation of wealth" in American history.

The federal government issued bonds! This act said in essence that the federal government could now create debt. President Lincoln gave the North, which was everyone left in Congress, the power to create obligations on future generations which would have to be repaid with interest. And the bond could be used as security to issue national bank notes. President Lincoln made the use of these notes mandatory. Anyone not honoring the notes could be held in contempt of Congress and incarcerated.

As a result, the Northern industrialists won the war. Remember the simple example I started with. You were a farmer and others ganged up on you to control you. What chance did you have? This was the result of combinations of power wasn’t it? This is exactly what Lincoln did. It was the epitome of high treason!

Do you think there were any Constitutional restraints left upon the Northern industrialists? Absolutely not!

This was no longer the government our forefathers bequeathed to their posterity. It was a bunch of elite, power-hungry corporate leaders who took control. Mob rule now superseded Constitution law. Lincoln created an oligarchy (dictatorship) where once stood a free nation. An oligarchy as defined by the unabridged Random House dictionary CCU Quarterly Insights Volume #1 Issue #116 says, "a form of government in which the power is vested in a few persons or in a dominant class or clique!" I’m being kind. This was really not an oligarchy but the beginning of what has become a full-blown dictatorship in Washington D.C.

This was and still is at the expense of the common folk, just in case you didn’t notice.

So, President Lincoln and the Northern industrialists took control of the country. Corporations spread like a plague following the Civil War. With the help of Congress, wealth was appropriated almost exclusively to the clique of criminal, international, elitist, banking cartel-thugs and CEOs of powerful corporations. America’s wealth was concentrated in the hands of powerful criminals.

Let’s jump to the 1870’s where we see a consolidation of power that caused a major crisis.

The Northern industrialists built more factories as a result of the industrial revolution. People were forced to move from the country to the cities to earn a living and to make ends meet. They lived in slums growing up and around the corporations, which provided jobs akin to slave labor. This was not a nice time in American history.

What chance do you think was left for the individual laborer to compete against the powerful elite? None!

The common folk understood this. What was the natural result? Did they try to create their own combinations of power? The answer is "YES."

Isn’t this what led to Labor Unions? The purpose was to accomplish some degree of parity.

 Who do you think won the battle?

Didn’t the industrialists own everything? Of course!

They owned the land on which people built their homes. They owned the little corner stores. They owned the churches. They owned the schools. They owned the doctors. They owned the means of production. They owned the money. They owned the transportation. They owned communications, and on and on I could go.

What had America turned into?

When most or all of a nation’s production, communications, labor, education etc. is in the hands of the government or its henchmen, we call this socialism! And you thought socialism in America was a relatively modern development? Think again!

What would happen if one or two laborers began to speak out against this raw abuse of power?

Our American history is replete with examples of brutality. When the numbers grew larger, the industrialists hired their own private armies to put down the rebellion. People were beaten, their homes torched, children kidnapped and women were raped in front of their children and husbands.

So, major industrial labor relations developed. The industrialists who owned the corporations knew that they would eventually be out-numbered. They had to do something.

For the past 50 years Americans have been taught that corrupted Soviet leaders propagandized the people. We were led to feel sorry for the plight of the Russian common folk. We thought that they should have some freedom. It never dawned on the majority of Americans that the same thing had been going on here, only that different techniques had been used.

The industrialists still control America. This has been going on for a long, long time. We have been propagandized as much, if not more, than the Russian people or any other people in world history.

Back before the Civil War, the industrialists created specific policies regarding the growing problem of labor relations. Let’s take a closer look.

In Idaho, a work force gathered up a substantial amount of dynamite. They went into the mines and blew up everything.

There was the Pullman strike of 1894 when the railroad workers actually took over the railroad. The federal government sent troops against these laborers just as any dictator would. It claimed the laborers were in violation of the anti-trust laws.

Perhaps the height of deceit and brutality, in my opinion the precursor of bad times to come, was an incident that occurred in a little town in Colorado called Ludlow. Have you heard of the Ludlow Massacre of 1914? It was despicable and ruthless and is one of the better lessons in history that exposes the difference between God’s Law and mob rule.

Compare this to our present day and see if there are lessons to be learned.

An industrialist by the name of John D. Rockefeller appropriated to himself most of the state of Colorado. Of course, this was done on the recommendation of Congress and implemented with the help of those he influenced with his money.

Remember what I said about expropriation. His CCU Quarterly Insights Volume #1 Issue #117 railroad, a gift from the federal government, came from Dodge City along the Arkansas River into Colorado. At the head of the Arkansas River he built a town. It was expropriated from the people. Its’ name is Pueblo. He owned steel mills there known as the CF&I, the Colorado Fuel & Iron Company.

He had already expropriated, from the people to himself, the entire Arkansas River Valley. This was the Arkansas River Valley Company. Every type of farmer lived in the valley, some foreign and some national. They mostly raised sugar beets.

The Holly Sugar Corporation converted the beets into sugar. It was shipped down river and eventually to Chicago and the rest of the world through the Eastern united states of America under the control of the criminal elitist industrialist tycoons owned and controlled by the European banking cartel-thugs.

Look at the steel mills in Pueblo. The iron ore needed to produce the steel at CF&I had been appropriated by the government to the Montana Steel and Iron Company. The iron ore was brought down from the North to the CF&I mills.

You have to understand that it takes a lot of coal to run a steel mill. Almost the entire Southern Rocky Mountain range had been appropriated to the CF&I.

This is where Ludlow was . . . right in the middle of the steel mills.

This is where the common folk  produced the coal to run the Steel Mills. CF&I was owned by John D. Rockefeller along with the railroads and just about everything else in the state of Colorado.

Finally, the workers at Ludlow walked out of the mines. They quit. They formed their own little tent city in Ludlow. John D. Rockefeller Jr. ordered the governor of the state of Colorado, Governor Ahmans, who worked for CF&I, to send the Baldwin Phillips Security forces, a private army of Rockefeller’s, into Ludlow to massacre the workers.

This private army moved in on this tiny tent city.

The Governor of Colorado also called in the state militia and combined these troops with the private army of Rockefeller and together they moved in on Ludlow under the flag of the Republic of Colorado.

They went in by railroad, opened fire, and killed all the men, woman, and children. Following this godless act, a major protest arose throughout America.

People in New Your City rose up in disgust. It was reported that they were going to gun down John D. Rockefeller like a dog in the street.

Can you see the potential for a revolution?

It wasn’t going to be a revolution of the common folk against the government. It was going to be a revolution of Americans against the major industrialists who were expropriating the wealth of the American people.

Today we might call it "big business combined with big government." They are inseparable.

Charles W. Eliot was the President of Harvard University (1869 - 1909). He was also a board member of the General Education Board, which was one of the Rockefeller Endowments. He went to John D. Rockefeller and advised him that there was a problem developing. He said that "we" can no longer afford to force the people of this nation to work for us at gunpoint. They will rise up against us and run us out of the country, if we are lucky, and most likely will kill us.

He suggested that they change their entire image. They would have to provide for the needs of the labor force. He suggested that they provide for adequate nutrition, education, housing and medical care.

He reasoned that if Rockefeller, with all his wealth, would give some sense of security to the workers, history would eventually show that he would be looked upon as the "good guy."

He pointed out that a happy worker is a more profitable worker.

John D. Rockefeller agreed. But Rockefeller would not pay for this. Instead, he went to his hired hoods (politicians) in the government. He told them that they owed him their elections and what he wanted from them.

What do you think happened?

The Colorado plan was written and developed after the Ludlow Massacre. The University of Chicago was built, and the Behavioral Sciences Department was created to develop a plan that would guarantee the workers’ happiness.

A central planning committee, mapped out in detail, what it would take to provide for all these things.

The personnel were trained. In the intervening years, this liberal/socialist/communist program made tremendous headway.

By 1933 everything was in place. They ran a man for President. Who, do you think, that man was? His name was Franklin Delano Roosevelt.

On March 4th of 1933, in his inaugural address, he announced to the world and to the nation that he was going to ask Congress for the one instrument that he claimed he needed to meet the crisis of the depression.

He needed broad sweeping executive powers to wage war against this emergency. The kind CCU Quarterly Insights Volume #1 Issue #118 of power needed would be just as great as if America was invaded by a foreign army.

Doesn’t this sound a lot like President Lincoln?

What kind of power was Roosevelt asking for?

Wouldn’t this be construed as dictatorial power?

Obviously Roosevelt had a plan. He was carrying out the orders of those powerful industrialists who had paid for his election. He was directed by a brain trust that finds it roots in the Behavioral Sciences Department of the University of Chicago and paid for by Rockefeller money.

On March 5, 1933 he issued an executive order calling for an emergency session of Congress.

 It convened on March 9, 1933.

On March 6, 1933 he called for a Governor’s Conference. They convened in Washington D.C. These Governors passed a resolution proclaiming their wholehearted support for the President’s liberal/socialist/communist plan and his use of the War Powers Act to deal with the emergency of the great depression. These Governors urged Congress to pass the act that would convey broad powers to the President.

Let’s digress for a moment. Most of these Governors directly owed their elections to the industrialists. The few who did not, owed their elections indirectly to the same industrialists. The powerful combinations I prefer to call corporations, owned these politicians.

This stampeding of the leadership controlled by the industrialists brought into focus the International Socialist goals for world conquest and dominion.

On March 8, 1933, every Governor, of every state, proclaimed a state of emergency in their respective states. There was 100% unity.

This must be examined more closely.

What are the chances that there would be a few righteous men among those leaders if left to natural causes. The rational mind would have to conclude that there would have to be a few.

 Wrong!

I contend that the liberal/socialist/communist goal of control over America by 1933 was already completed. I also contend that the influence of the power brokers and evil minions of the criminal, international, elitist, banking cartel-thugs was in place and functional.

It may not have been as refined as it is today, but nonetheless, it was complete.

I contend these power brokers already had control over every type of leadership in this nation at that time.

What types of people succumbed to the pressures of the criminal, international, elitist, banking cartelthugs?

Church leaders, presidents and trustees of universities and institutions of higher learning, the news media, all the major newspapers and magazines, trade journals, leaders in communications and education, all the major corporations and even many of the minor ones, owners of production and manufacturing of every sort and on and on.

No one of merit was exempted from the pressure.

In the intervening years since 1933 the concentration of power has been fine tuned to fool the common folk virtually all the time. Slick subliminal techniques in advertising have been so refined that the expected end and net results are always accurately achieved and maintained.

Back to1933. Unanimously and simultaneously, every Governor declared within his state a "State of National Emergency."

Look at Black’s Law Dictionary and see what it says about "State of National Emergency." You’ll notice that there is no difference between a State of National Emergency and a State of War.

Congress, in emergency session on the evening of March 9th, passed the first act proclaiming that a State of National Emergency existed within this country. It was called the Emergency Banking Relief Act.

They assumed powers under an old World War I Act called the "Trading with the Enemy Act" that gave the President virtually dictatorial powers over enemies of these united states of America during times of war.

They amended that act to include sovereign American citizens as enemies of this nation. Go read it for yourself. It is there for all to read and study.

YOU ARE CONSIDERED AN ENEMY OF YOUR COUNTRY! Any time the government wants to have you picked you up and charged with "high treason" it can! Is your attitude beginning to change? CCU and its marketing arm, TWA, need your help, now!

These acts are still on the books and they still apply.

http://www.coastal.edu/newsletter/

To Be Continued In Nov. Pearl

[ Click here for November posting ]

   

[ Home ]

Click here to enter this hundreds of postings

Address Questions or comments to [  admin@pushhamburger.com  ]